Language as a Weapon: The Logical Fallacies in Political Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63924/jsid.v3i2.227Keywords:
Language Manipulation, Logical Fallacies, Political Discourse, Critical Review, Discourse AnalysisAbstract
In modern political discourse, language serves as both a means of communication and a strategic instrument for influencing public reasoning and consolidating ideological dominance. This study examines how political figures utilise language to disseminate logical fallacies that skew rational judgement and influence public perception. The main aim is to discover, classify, and critically assess the linguistic strategies that incorporate faulty reasoning in political discourse. The study utilises a critical review methodology to synthesise findings from 45 peer-reviewed journal publications published between 2010 and 2024 in the disciplines of linguistics, political science, philosophy, and discourse analysis. Data were gathered via systematic searches in Scopus-indexed databases and analysed thematically through qualitative content analysis and the principles of critical discourse analysis. The results indicate four prevailing patterns: (1) the tactical employment of informal fallacies, including ad hominem and false dilemma; (2) the rhetorical amplification of fallacies via causal and contrastive connectives; (3) the emotional framing of arguments to evade critical examination; and (4) the normalisation of erroneous reasoning through media and political discourse repetition. These findings highlight the necessity for improved critical literacy and public consciousness regarding rhetorical manipulation in democratic nations. The research enhances multidisciplinary discourse on language and authority and provides practical applications for education, journalism, and civic participation.
References
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.
Friedrich, P. (1989). Language, ideology, and political economy. American Anthropologist, 91(2), 295–312.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Beacon Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lefevere, A. (1992). Translation, rewriting, and the manipulation of literary fame. Routledge.
Oswald, S., & Herman, T. (2016). Argumentation and rhetoric: A critical overview. Argumentation, 30(4), 1–23.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. Routledge.
Russell, B. (2007). The philosophy of logical atomism. Routledge.
Schumann, K., Zufferey, S., & Oswald, S. (2021). The straw man fallacy in political discourse: A corpus-based and experimental study. Journal of Pragmatics, 178, 1–15.
Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage Publications.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Zurloni, V., & Anolli, L. (2010). The rhetoric of political debates: A comparative analysis of Italian political leaders. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1035–1051.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Ifan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
%20-%20Copy.png)
