People's Views on Stereotypes of Pidie and Padang Communities

Authors

  • Amar Azizi Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63924/jsid.v5i1.19

Keywords:

Stereotypes, Society, Pidie, Padang, Communities

Abstract

This research aims to eliminate excessive negative assessments of a particular group or tribe before knowing and interacting with them directly. This research uses a descriptive-qualitative approach and obtains data by conducting interviews, observation, and documentation. This research uses symbolic interaction theory, which discusses some of the characteristics and processes of stereotype formation and also the factors that influence the existence of stereotypes against the Pidie and Padang communities. The results of this study show that most of the people of Banda Aceh do not judge the attitude of an individual in terms of ethnicity or the tribe where they come from. Instead, they see it directly from the person himself. Then most of them equally disagree or do not take issue with negative stereotypes about people from Pidie and Padang. In fact, they have their own stereotypes aimed at the people of Pidie and Padang, and the stereotypes are mostly positive stereotypes. The stereotypes of the people of Banda Aceh towards people from Pidie and Padang are inseparable from the interactions that occur in Banda Aceh City. In addition, stereotypes are also obtained from social environments such as family or close people. Stereotypes of negative views include people from Pidie and Padang being considered stingy, arrogant, chatty, stubborn, and selfish. However, there are also positive stereotypes, such as that people who come from Pidie and Padang are disciplined, not easily offended, frugal, good at trading, sociable, good at managing finances, persistent, enterprising, assertive, good at culinary, highly social, and have a good work ethic. The factors that influence the stereotypes of the people of Banda Aceh towards people from Pidie and Padang are not something that is brought about by birth but arise because they are learned from the social environment, perceptions, direct interaction, cultural elements, and mass media.

References

Ahmad, Sihabudin. (2013). Komunikasi Antar Budaya Satu Perspektif Multidimensi. Bumi Aksara.

Alo, Liliweri. (2003). Dasar-Dasar Komunikasi Antarbudaya. Pustaka Belajar.

Amna, Zaujatul, and Ruhul Aflah. (2020). ‘Stereotip PidieKriet Terhadap Perilaku Altruisme. Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi, 05, 141–52

Andi Prastowo. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Perspektif Rancangan Penelitian. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Praktek. Rajawali Pers.

Azhari. (2021). The Flu Film as a Medium for Creative and Innovative Solutions to Directly Inform the Response to the Current Covid-19 Outbreak in Humanitarian Settings. JOURNAL OF SOCIETY INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT (JSID), 3(1), 645–799. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8332620

Azhari. (2021). The Impacts of Rajab Celebration Culture on Social Communities in Turkey. JOURNAL OF SOCIETY INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT (JSID), 3(1), 607–709. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8332599

Bimo, Walgito. (2003). Psikologi Sosial (Suatu Pengantar). Andi Offset.

BPS. (2019). Kecamatan Ulee Kareng Dalam Angka 2019. BPS

BPS. (2020). Kecamatan Baiturrahman Dalam Angka 2020. BPS.

BPS. (2020). Kota Banda Aceh Dalam Angka 2020. BPS

BPS. (2021). Kecamatan Syiah Kuala Dalam Angka 2021. BPS

Burhan Bugin. (2001) Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Aktualisasi Metodologi Ke Arah Ragam Varian Kontemporer. Raja Grafindo Persada.

D.P. Budi Susetyo. (2010). Stereotip Dan Relasi Antar Kelompok. Graha Ilmu.

Desy Anwar. (2003). Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia. Amelia.

Dina Haja Ristianti. (2015). Psikologi Lintas Budaya. Zaky Press.

Djuarsa, Sendjaja. (2004). Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Universitas Terbuka.

E,Ardianto. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Public Relations: Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Emzir. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Analisis Data. Raja Grafindo.

Faisal, Sanafiah. (2007). Format-Format Penelitian Sosial. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Fattah Hanurawan. (2010). Psikologi Sosial Suatu Terapan. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Feybee H. Rumondor, Ridwan Paputungan, Ridwan Paputungan. (2014). ‘Stereotip Suku Minahasa Terhadap Terhadap Etnis Papua. Journal “Acta Diurna”. III.2.

Hadler, J. (2010). Sengketa Tiada Putus: Matriarkat, Reformisme Agama, Dan Kolonialisme Di Minangkabau. Freedom Institute.

Ibrahim, I.S. (2011). Kritik Budaya Komunikasi. Jalasutra.

Ibrahim. (2017). Komunikasi Antar Budaya. Pontianak Press.

Idrus. (2009). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Sosial. Erlangga.

J.p Chaplin. (2004). Kamus Lengkap Psikologi. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Juliansyah, Noor. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian. Kencana.

Liliweri, A. (2009). Prasangka & Konflik: Komunikasi Lintas Budaya Masyarakat Multikultur. LkiS Yogyakarta.

Miftahuddi, (2015). Stereotip Warga Banda Aceh Terhadap Sifat Orang Pidie (Studi Komunikasi Antarbudaya). Universitas Syiah Kuala.

Moeleong, lexy J. (2005). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mohad Nazir. (2005). Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.

Mukti Ali. (2016). Komunikasi Antarbudaya Dalam Tradisi Agama Jawa. Pustaka Ilmu.

Mulyana, Deddy dan Jalaluddin, Rakhmat. (2010). Komunikasi Antar Budaya. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Narwawi, Hadari. (2007). Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Gajah Mada University Press.

Nasrullah, R. (2012). Komunikasi Antarbudaya Di Era Budaya Siber. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Nurkhalis, Muizatun Hasanah. (2016). ‘Stereotip Budaya Antar Mahasiswa Di Lingkungan Fakultas Dakwah. Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI. 50–60

Rahardjo, Daryanto. (2016). Teori Komunikasi. Gava Media.

Rinjani Bahri, Subhani. (2017). Komunikasi Lintas Budaya. Unimal Press.

Seto Mulyadi, Wahyu Rahardjo, Anugriaty Indah Asmarany. (2016). Psikologi Sosial. Gunadarma.

Shihab Quraish, Tafsir Al-Misbah Pesan. (2002). Kesan Dan Keserasian Al-Quran. Lentera Hati.

Soerjono Soekanto. (1993). Kamus Sosiologi, Edisi Baru. PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soerjono Soekanto. (2005). Kamus Sosiologi. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suranto. (2013). Komunikasi Sosial Budaya. Graha Ilmu.

Tina Kartika. (2013). Komunikasi Antarbudaya (Definisi, Teori Dan Aplikasi Penelitian. Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Lampung.

Tony & Barry Buzan. (2004). Memahami Peta Pikiran (The Mind Map Book), Edisi Milenium. Interaksara.

Triyani Putri, Fitria Yuliani. (2018). ‘Hambatan Komunikasi Pada Masyarakat Etnik Minang Di Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI.

Yacob, A., Husnayanti, A. A., Widarti, E., Thaib, J., Syawal, M., Ibrahim, M. D. (2018). Pernak Pernik Pidie (Kuliner, Budaya, Sejarah, & Ekonomi). Bandar Publishing.

Zulfahmi, Nur AnisahM.Si. (2018). ‘StereotipMahasiswa Aceh TerhadapMahasiswa Gayo’, Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FISIP Unsyiah.

Published

2023-10-09

How to Cite

Amar Azizi. (2023). People’s Views on Stereotypes of Pidie and Padang Communities. Journal of Society Innovation and Development, 5(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.63924/jsid.v5i1.19