Types of Implicatures Hate Speech TikTok Social Media
Keywords:
hate speech, Implicature, TikTok, Social Media, CommunicationAbstract
Background of the problem: Communication in social networks and everyday life, we use language as a means of communication. Language is a tool of interaction or communication, which is a tool to convey thoughts, ideas, concepts, and emotions. Language is also considered a system of symbols in the form of sounds that are arbitrary, agile, dynamic, diverse, and humanized. Language is a communication tool to convey messages to others, and through language, humans can interact with others. Purpose: The objectives of this research are to identify the types of implicature’s contained in hate speech in the TikTok social media comment section. Method: The research method used by researchers in this study is a qualitative approach using a descriptive type. Documentation technique is a technique where data obtained for research needs comes from existing documents on written objects, books, pictures, which are related to the object of research. In this study, the documentation used is by taking documentation in the form of screenshots or screenshots of uploads or comments found on social media TikTok. Result: As a result of this research, the author concludes that there are two types of implicature, including 1) conversational implicature and 2) conventional implicature. Implication: This study provides insight into how implicatures, both conversational and conventional, are used in hate speech on social media. This study contributes to the broader field of pragmatics by illustrating how language functions in digital communication.
References
Algül, A., & Akpınar, M. (2022). Hate Speech on Social Media. Advances in Human Services and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8421-7.ch016.
Danuri, M. (2019). Perkembangan dan transformasi digital. Infokam.
Djajasudarma, F. (2012). Wacana & pragmatik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Fedorenko, E., Piantadosi, S., & Gibson, E. (2024). Language is primarily a tool for communication rather than thought. Nature, 630 8017, 575-586. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07522-w.
Global, R., & Salim, M. (2023). VERBAL AND NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION IN LINGUISTICS. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science. https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30062023/8003.
Horn, L. R., & Ward, G. (2004). The handbook of pragmatics. Blackwell.
Kepolisian RI. (2015). Penangan ujaran kebencian (Surat Edaran Nomor: Se/6/X/2015).
Maarouf, A., Pröllochs, N., & Feuerriegel, S. (2022). The Virality of Hate Speech on Social Media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 1 - 22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3641025.
Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Farkas, J. (2021). Racism, Hate Speech, and Social Media: A Systematic Review and Critique. Television & New Media, 22, 205 - 224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982230.
Mawarti, S. (2018). Fenomena hate speech. Toleransi: Media Komunikasi Umat Beragama.
Mitra, A., Ahmed, N., Pramanik, P., & Nandi, S. (2020). Language Studies and Communication Models., 3, 1776-1794. https://doi.org/10.15864/IJELTS.3110.
Nadar. (2009). Pragmatik dan penelitian pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Grahailmu.
Nomaan, S. (2022). Review of Language and Digital Media: Pragmatics Online. Technology in Language Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v4n2.829.
Nugrahani, F. (2014). Metode penelitian kualitatif dalam penelitian pendidikan bahasa. Surakarta: Cakra Books.
Scott-Phillips, T. (2025). Communication and grammar: A synthesis. Psychological review. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000542.
Sudaryanto. (1988). Pragmatik, cara pengajarannya dan cara penilaiannya dalam bahasa Indonesia. Cakrawala Pendidikan.
Taavitsainen, I., & Jucker, A. (2020). Digital pragmatics of English., 107-124. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003031758-7.
Taguchi, N. (2023). Technology-enhanced language learning and pragmatics: Insights from digital game-based pragmatics instruction. Language Teaching, 57, 57 - 67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000101.
Taylor, S., & Workman, L. (2021). Language and communication. Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003014355-6.
Yang, K. (2023). Types and Success of Language Communication. The Korean Society of Human and Nature. https://doi.org/10.54913/hn.2023.4.2.315.
Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Zamzani. (2007). Kajian sosiopragmatik. Yogyakarta: Cipta Pustaka.
Zubaedah, S. (2021). Implikatur dalam buku wacana humor politik Indonesia.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Afni Sigalingging, Martina Girsang, Charles David Marudut Silalahi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.