Lexical Adaptation during Formative Assessment under the Merdeka Curriculum Framework in Non-Formal EFL Classrooms

Authors

  • Videlindah Ani Sophiandry Haan Aryasatya Deo Muri University https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7641-6846
  • Margana Margana Yogyakarta State University
  • Maria Kanisia Apriliani Boston University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63924/jsid.v7i2.239

Keywords:

Teacher talk, Corpus linguistics, Formative assessment, Lexical diversity, Non-formal education

Abstract

The implementation of decentralized, student-centered curricula frequently demands that educators dynamically modify their instructional input during real time formative evaluation sequences. However, how these pedagogical demands alter the micro linguistic parameters of teacher talk remains under-researched, particularly within non-formal educational settings characterized by mixed ability learner groups. This study investigated the real time lexical adaptation of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers during embedded formative assessments within a non-formal framework in Indonesia. Utilizing a quantitative corpus linguistic design, a specialized spoken micro corpus of 14,250 running tokens was compiled from authentic classroom interactions and segmented into general instruction and formative assessment sub-corpora. The text files were computationally processed to calculate variations in the Moving-Average Type-Token Ratio (“MATTR”) and lexical density percentages. The empirical findings revealed a systematic, statistically significant reduction in both linguistic metrics when instructors transitioned into active evaluation phases. The group mean for “MATTR” dropped from 0.63 to 0.52, while the mean lexical density declined from 46.1 percent to 37.5 percent during active testing loops. This structural contraction was driven by a massive increase in formulaic question prompts and the purposeful repetition of target lexical items to prevent comprehension breakdowns. These results imply that interactive pedagogical tasks automatically trigger structural language simplification, meaning that teachers require explicit training in micro linguistic management to ensure that temporary input simplification is balanced by deliberate phases of lexical enrichment.

References

Arisanti, D. A. K. (2022). Analisis kurikulum Merdeka dan platform Merdeka belajar untuk mewujudkan pendidikan yang berkualitas. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 8(2), 243-250. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v8io2.1386

Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, genre, and style (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610117

Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2018). Register variation online. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108529457

Crossley, S. A. (2020). Linguistic features in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, Article 100718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100718

Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Does text readability matter for second language reading comprehension? An evaluation of text naturalness and processing force. System, 47(3), 245-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.06.002

Egbert, J., Larsson, T., & Biber, D. (2020). Doing linguistics with R: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770736

Haan, V. A. S., Margana, M., & Apriliani, M. K. (2025). Implementing the Merdeka Curriculum in English Language Teaching at Rumah Belajar Aksi-Inspirasi: A Case Study of Strategies and Challenges. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(2), 732–745. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i2.12867

Hadi, A., Marniati, M., Ngindana, R., Kurdi, M. S., & Fauziah, F. (2023). New paradigm of Merdeka Belajar curriculum in schools. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 1497-1510. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.3126

Horst, M. (2019). Focus on input in the second language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 72-89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051900005X

Kyle, K., Crossley, S. A., & Berger, C. M. (2018). The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES) version 2.0. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1030-1046. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0924-4

MacIntyre, P. D., & Gregersen, T. (2022). Dynamic systems theory and the evolution of teacher talk adaptation. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.2.3

Mercer, S. (2021). The psychology of language teacher agency in curriculum reform. Modern Language Journal, 105(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12684

4

Published

2026-04-19

How to Cite

Haan, V. A. S., Margana, M., & Apriliani, M. K. (2026). Lexical Adaptation during Formative Assessment under the Merdeka Curriculum Framework in Non-Formal EFL Classrooms. Journal of Society Innovation and Development, 7(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.63924/jsid.v7i2.239