We provide our authors flexibility in formatting their manuscripts. Your article doesn’t have to conform to a strict structure. While all manuscripts require essential elements, we do not impose any limit on article length or the number of tables and figures. If you need guidance, we also provide templates as a guide and facilitate the writing process systematically. You can modify the templet and adapt it to the needs of your research or scientific article (the template can be downloaded here). Here is the templet structure:

 

 

Title Should be a Concise Statement of the Main Topic

Author

Department, Faculty, Universitas, City, Country

Email: abcd@su.uk

Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0000-000-0000

Author*

Department, Faculty, Universitas, City, Country

Email: abcd@su.uk

Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0000-000-0000

*Corresponding author: Author, Department, Faculty, Universitas, City, Country Email: axsjajaaa@abcd.uk

 

Abstract

The abstract should include: (1) background of the problem, (2) research objective, (3) methodology, (4) key findings, and (5) implications. Keyword: Keyword one; keyword two; keyword three; keyword four; keyword five

Introduction

The introduction should include: (1) establishing the context, background and/or importance of the topic. (2) giving a brief review of the relevant academic literature. (3) identifying a problem, controversy or a knowledge gap in the field of study. (4) stating the aim(s) of the research and the research questions or hypotheses. (5) providing a synopsis of the research design and method(s). (6) explaining the significance or value of the study. (7) defining certain key terms. (8) providing an overview of the dissertation or report structure.

Literature Review

The literature review should include: (1) Overview of the theory for this study; Various theories that specifically discuss the topic of this study; Specific theories about this study; Expert opinions on the main criteria in the specific theory; Various factors in the specific theory; Specific factors. (2) Introduction about the existence of various approaches/theoretical frameworks/models from various theories; Listing the approaches/theoretical frameworks/models used regarding aspects, dimensions, and indicators; Statement about the approaches/theoretical frameworks/models adapted according to the research context. (3) The origins and development of the approach/theoretical framework/model used in this study; Previous researchers for certain reasons (i.e. integrating several approaches/theoretical frameworks/models) used this model; According to the context, previous researchers adapted this approach/theoretical framework/model. (4) Arguments about the system in the approach/theoretical framework/model used. That the approach/theoretical framework/model from the above theory (formal object) can be used to discuss material objects concerning specific problems. (5) A description of the material object according to the context being researched. (Paragraph 6) An overview of the subject, namely the context that is the focus of this study. From beginning to end. (7) Statement about the focus of previous research on this study; Statement about the focus of the current study is more specific and different from previous research; Urgency of the current research.

Methodology

The section should include research design, data source, data collection, instruments, data collecting procedures, measurement, and data analysis techniques.

Research Design

A research design is a strategic plan or framework for conducting a research study. It outlines the methods and procedures to collect and analyze data, as well as the goals and objectives of the study. Essentially, it guides the entire research process, ensuring that the study is conducted systematically and rigorously. In simple terms, what type of research is this, why should you use it.

Data Sources

Describe where the research data came from. Such as, the location of the research, books, content, and if using the informant interviewed, then you must state the reason why they deserve to be informants to be interviewed. Participant characteristics. Etc.

Data Collection and Procedure

Explain how the data was obtained or the steps. Examples: Researchers conducted individual in-depth semi-structural interviews with the three participants to get the data compatible with the research objectives. The semi-structural interview guidelines in narrative research become a tool to listen and do not literally lead the process of interviews. Narrative research depends on the story told by the participants, therefore, listening to it is more vital than leading the interviews. This process makes the participants to be able to tell their story naturally without feeling nervous by the pressure from the researchers’ questions.

Data Analysis

How to analyze the analysis technique using what. Examples: There are some steps in the process of data analysis in this study, 1) analysis involving the interviews data transcript and 2) in-depth analysis of each individual’s transcript data followed by intra-status analysis. The data transcript from the interviews is carefully read line by line to find the essence of every narration by numbering every line of it. The transcript data analysis approach uses model categories, namely (1) Choosing the relevant texts from the interviews; (2) Developing the meaningful categories; (3) Sorting the materials into categories; (4) Making a conclusion out of the result. Categorizing the content of the transcripts produced a more in-depth analysis in every obtained theme. Synthesis categorization of the content results in in-depth and comprehensive analysis data as well as the emotional features and language can be observed as a crosscheck material for the data and the cases.

Finding

The results should include:Present the results objectively, supported by data (quotes, numbers, or examples), organized thematically or categorically. and must create a figure to illustrate the findings, at least one illustration. This will make it easier for readers to understand the research findings.

Discussion

The section should include: Providing background information: reference to the literature; Providing background information: reference to the question; Restating the result or one of several results; Pointing out interesting or important findings; Indicating an unexpected outcome; Comparing the result: supporting previous findings; Comparing the result: contradicting previous findings; Offering an explanation for the findings; Advising cautious interpretation of the findings; Suggesting general hypotheses; Noting implications of the findings; Commenting on the findings; Giving suggestions for future work.

Conclusion

The section should include: (1)Restating the aims of the study. (2)Summarising main research findings. (3)Suggesting implications for the field of knowledge. (4)Explaining the significance of the findings or contribution of the study. (5)Recognising the limitations of the current study. (6)Acknowledging limitation(s) whilst stating a finding or contribution. (7)Making recommendations for further research work. (8)Setting out recommendations for practice or policy.

Acknowledgment

If any, acknowledgment can be stated here. This section displays authors’ appreciation to sponsors, fund donors, resource persons, or parties who have an important role in conducting research. Examples: The author thanks the original participants in this study for their trust, willingness to learn, and desire to create meaningful change.

Declaration of Conflicting Interest

Examples: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Bibliography

The references entry is arranged in alphabetical order. All that is referred to in the text must be listed in the reference list, and all written in the reference list must be referred to in the text. The author is obliged to list all the references validly according to the sources and DOI (digital object identifier), particularly for entries from journals. In the case of cities of publication, differences should be made in writing cities of the USA and cities outside the USA. For example, cities in the USA are listed together with the initials of the state; e.g.: for Boston of Massachusset: Boston, MA. All references and citations use the APA Style 7th Edition. For citation and reference managers, it is mandatory to use the Mendeley app. If there are information and explanations relating to the further clarification of the content of the manuscript citation is using footnotes.

Examples of reference entries:

(Type: book, author = publisher)

American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

(Type: e-book)

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2005). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9853/how-people-learn-brainmind-experience-and-school-expanded-edition.

(Type: edited book, two editors or more)

Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure? New York, NY: Routledge.

(Type: book section)

Idris, S., Tabrani ZA., Sulaiman, F., & Amsori. (2020). Emerging Perspectives and Trends in Innovative Technology for Quality Education 4.0. In Kusmawan et.al. (Eds.). Assessment of Critical Education Concepts in the Perspective of Islamic Education. London: Routledge, pp. 66-70.

(Type: book, in English translated into Indonesian, original title intact)

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (E. Hamdiah & R. Fajar, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. (Original work published 2012).

(Type: book, Indonesian, not translation, an original title retained)

Tabrani ZA. (2017). Menggugat Logika Nalar Rasionalisme Aristoteles. Yogyakarta: Mizan.

(Type: book, one author)

Tabrani ZA (2015). Persuit Epsitemology of Islamic Studies. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.

(Type: book, two authors)

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (Fifth ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

(Type: book, three authors)

Walidin, W., Idris, S., & Tabrani ZA. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif & Grounded Theory. Banda Aceh: FTK Ar-Raniry Press.

(Type: journal article, online)

Patimah, S., & Tabrani ZA. (2018). Counting Methodology on Educational Return Investment. Advanced Science Letters, 24(10), 7087–7089. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12414

Damaskinidis, G. (2017). Ideological shifts between bilingual EU texts: A critical discourse analysis (CDA) approach to translation. Babel, 63, 702-728.

Mohd Yusoff, M. Z., Hamzah, A., Fajri, I., ZA, T., & Yusuf, S. M. (2022). The Effect of Spiritual and Social Norm in Moral Judgement. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 27(1), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2022.2156799

(Type: journal article, if the doi doesn't exist, then there must be an article URL)

Idris, S., Tabrani ZA., Sulaiman, F., & Murziqin, R. (2020). The Role of KKNI Curriculum in Supporting the Development of Education at the LPTK UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6), 4011-4024. Retrieved from https://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/15765/7958

(Type: journal article, three authors)

Casey, E., Kudeva, R., & Rousson, A. (2018). Institutionalization of Religion in Schools to Intercultural Education. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v6i1.215

(Type: journal article, 4 or more authors, all full names written)

Abdullah, A., Ismail, M., Yaacob, M., Kamarudin, M., Mohd Alwi, M., Muhammad, M., Wan Mohd Nasir, W., & Hilaluddin, N. (2019). A Qualitative Approach towards the Understanding of Managerial Employees in Islamic Organizations. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 7(3), 589-600. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v7i3.465

(Types: prosiding)

Retnowati, E. (2012, 24-27 November). Learning mathematics collaboratively or Individually. Paper presented at the The 2nd International Conference of STEM in Education, Beijing Normal University, China. https://stem2012.bnu.edu.cn/data/short%20paper/stem2012_88.pdf.

(Type: document, report:  institution, government, organization)

NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

 

(Type: document, legal texts, original terms written followed by translation)

Peraturan Presiden RI. No. 8. (2012). Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia. [Indonesian National Qualification Framework].

Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi RI. No. 44. (2015). Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. [National Standards of Higher Education].