¹University, Address, Country

²University, Address, Country

³University, Address, Country

⁴University, Address, Country

⁵University, Address, Country

INTRODUCTION

Research Problem

The research problem is a specific issue or gap in existing knowledge that you aim to address in your research. You may choose to look for practical problems aimed at contributing to change, or theoretical problems aimed at expanding knowledge. Include citations from quality references (recent within the last five years and reputable).

Importance of Research for Field

The importance of research lies in its ability to generate new knowledge and insights, to test existing theories and ideas, and to solve practical problems. Advancing knowledge, Solving problems, Innovation. Evidence-based decision-making: Research provides evidence and data that can inform decision-making in various fields, such as policymaking, business strategy, and healthcare. Personal and professional development: Engaging in research can also contribute to personal and professional development, as it requires critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills. Include citations from quality references (recent within the last five years and reputable).

Research or Theoretical Gap

A research gap is an area or topic within a field of study that has not been extensively researched or is yet to be explored. It is a question, problem or issue that has not been addressed or resolved by previous research. A research gap is a key element in any research study, as it determines the area that lacks crucial information and guides the research question and objectives. Theoretical gap is a type of gap that deals with gaps in theory with prior research. If one phenomenon is being explained through various theoretical models, there might be a theoretical conflict. Lack of theoretical knowledge may lead to a gap in research. Include citations from quality references (recent within the last five years and reputable).

State of the Art

The results of the comparison in the literature review summarize and explain in this section and argue that it is the advantage and novelty of your research. Include citations from quality references (recent within the last five years and reputable).

Research Objective  

Research objectives are the outcomes that you aim to achieve by conducting research. Many research projects contain more than one research objective.

Research Question 

Create questions to formulate problems based on goals.

Research Hypothesis

Once you have formulated a research question, the subsequent step involves developing a specific hypothesis to be tested. A hypothesis is a testable statement grounded in theory or prior research. For instance: "Employees who maintain a good work-life balance will report higher levels of job satisfaction."

Research Outline

Research outlines are structured plans for organizing and presenting research in a clear and systematic way. For examples (Damaskinidis, 2017): “In this article, I will apply a critical discourse analysis (CDA) (Fairclough 2001, 2001a) methodology to the chosen Communication as a filter to investigate any ideological shifts between the English ST and its Greek translation, the target text (TT). The research first outlines the theoretical framework of the CDA tradition, interrelating the concepts of discourse, translation and ideology. A description is then provided of the analytical framework in which the ideological analysis of the data-text takes place. Afterwards, I proceed with a comparative analysis of the ST and the TT, always taking into account the pervasive nature of ideology. Finally, I assess the degree of mediation (Hatim and Mason 1997) present in the translation and its potential overall impact on the target readership.”

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

In research articles, this section clearly outlines the perspective(s) from which the research is being done, and the specific theories and key concepts on which it is based. In addition, it includes a synthesis of similar studies conducted on the subject in the context of the study and around the world, and a summary of the main issues surrounding the topic under discussion. Include citations from quality references (recent within the last five years and reputable).

METHOD

Research Design 

A research design is a strategic plan or framework for conducting a research study. It outlines the methods and procedures to collect and analyze data, as well as the goals and objectives of the study. Essentially, it guides the entire research process, ensuring that the study is conducted systematically and rigorously. In simple terms, what type of research is this, why should you use it. Include citations from quality references (recent within the last five years and reputable).

Data Source

Describe where the research data came from. Such as, the location of the research, books, content, and if using the informant interviewed, then you must state the reason why they deserve to be informants to be interviewed. Participant characteristics. Etc.

Data Collection and Procedure

Explain how the data was obtained or the steps. Examples: Researchers conducted individual in-depth semi-structural interviews with the three participants to get the data compatible with the research objectives. The semi-structural interview guidelines in narrative research become a tool to listen and do not literally lead the process of interviews. Narrative research depends on the story told by the participants, therefore, listening to it is more vital than leading the interviews. This process makes the participants to be able to tell their story naturally without feeling nervous by the pressure from the researchers’ questions. Include citations from quality references (recent within the last five years and reputable).

Data Analysis 

How to analyze the analysis technique using what. Examples: There are some steps in the process of data analysis in this study, 1) analysis involving the interviews data transcript and 2) in-depth analysis of each individual’s transcript data followed by intra-status analysis. The data transcript from the interviews is carefully read line by line to find the essence of every narration by numbering every line of it. The transcript data analysis approach uses model categories, namely (1) Choosing the relevant texts from the interviews; (2) Developing the meaningful categories; (3) Sorting the materials into categories; (4) Making a conclusion out of the result. Categorizing the content of the transcripts produced a more in-depth analysis in every obtained theme. Synthesis categorization of the content results in in-depth and comprehensive analysis data as well as the emotional features and language can be observed as a crosscheck material for the data and the cases. Include citations from quality references (recent within the last five years and reputable).

Accuracy 

How do you maintain its accuracy. Examples: The objectivity in conducting qualitative research is essential to maintain, because often that the subjectivity of the researchers is being involved in the research and it destroys the validity of the data. The objectivity of researchers also needs to be maintained through accuracy, so that the position of the researchers can be under control in every step and process of the research. This effort to maintain is accomplished by crosschecking the obtained data collected from the interviews with the school consular in cooperation with our university students who are being in practical works at the school. They observed the subject much more intensely when they were at school or when they were in outside school activities. The researchers realized that maternal or parental feelings sometimes distorted the interviews; however, the use of interviews guidelines was able to get it done without involving those feelings. The researchers also applied self-reflection on the profession of first author as a lecturer in a subject area of Family Psychology and the second author who is struggling with education development. Initiated from some writings of the first author about family and the second author about education, researchers started to develop a study on the relation of family in education development. Reflecting that continuity is vital in increasing the credibility of qualitative research, so as researchers we are able to reconsider how our own vision and passion are in the research on its every step and process.

Trustworthiness

How your research can be trusted. For example: Reliability in narrative inquiry research refers to dependability of the data and validity to the strength of the analysis of the data. Several methods were utilized to ensure trustworthiness of the data. An audiotape of each interview was recorded and then transcribed by a professional transcriptionist verbatim. The transcripts were compared with the audiotapes for accuracy. If needed, corrections to the transcripts were made. Five participants were given their transcribed text to read to confirm the accuracy of their interview. The participants chosen were random, based on convenience of a follow-up appointment at the clinic. No changes or alteration were suggested from the five participants. The original recordings were reviewed by researcher to ensure accuracy of all transcriptions. The participants were informed that they could read the findings of the research and determine whether the writing reveals the true experience for them. The same researcher interviewed all 16 participants. The same interview questions were utilized to elicit the personal story from the participants.

Ethical Review 

Whether the data you collect has gone through a licensing process, agreement, approval, or has complied with regulations. If the data is sourced from the public such as social media content, movies, news, etc., then it should be mentioned that the data is open and accessible to anyone or the public. Example: This study was permitted by the school and approved by Universitas along with Universitas. The agreement with the participants also enacted, to put their initials in the research if necessary. As gratitude, at the end of the interviews, the researchers give a memento in the form of souvenir. 

FINDING AND DISCUSSION

Finding

You must explain the important points of your results so that there is a correlation with the discussion. The analysis of the paper must be clear and comprehensive. The author must be explained the results in the specific sub-topic. Strengthen statements or your results with data evidence from the data collection techniques used. The result section summarizes the data collected and the statistical or data analytical treatments used. Report the data in sufficient detail to justify the conclusions. Mention all relevant results. If the result contains the form of tables, graphs, verbal descriptions, or a combination of the three, so they should not be too long and too large.

The writing style for the tables and figures is presented in Table 1. The table should not contain vertical lines (upright), while horizontal (flat) lines are only on the head and tail of the table. The font of the table entry may be reduced. Figures in the table should not be over-repeated in the narration before or after the table. All figures and tables should be cited in the main text as Table 1, Figure 1, Graph 1, etc.

Table 1. Recommended length of each section in the manuscript

You can also include a figure in the body of the script. Schemes follow the same formatting. Format examples for Figure are as follow.

Figure 1. This is a figure. Schemes follow the same formatting

You may have to describe briefly with a clear narrative about the contents of the tables and figures. Don't let the reader get confused with the pictures and tables that you display in your manuscript.

Discussion

This section is the core and most important part of the contents of the manuscript that will be loaded for publication. The discussion section is intended to interpret the results of the study in accordance with the theories used and not merely explain the author’s founding. The discussion must be enriched by referring to the results of previous studies published in scientific journals or findings from international studies. It is advisable to integrate findings into a collection of theories or established knowledge, development of a new theory, or modification of existing theories. A conceptual framework needs to be made clear to get the appropriate discussion. Include citations from quality references (recent within the last five years and reputable).

References in the manuscript are written in brackets. Here are the examples for one author, e.g., (Buseri, 2017), and two authors, e.g., (Badarch & Zanabar, 2017). If there are three to five authors, all authors are written in the first mention, e.g., (Casey, Kudeva, & Rausson, 2018) and the next mention is written as (Casey et al., 2018). Reference can also be written with a name outside the brackets, e.g., Buseri (2017) in accordance with the writing style. If the statement referred to is a direct quote or a specific fact, page number/s must be included, e.g., (Badarch & Zanabar, 2017: 143) or if substances are taken from several pages, e.g., (Badarch & Zanabar, 2017: 141-156). Indirect citations are more recommended than direct ones.

All citations in the manuscript must appear in the references list, and all the references must be cited in the text. The reference list must be arranged in alphabetical order following the APA style 7^th ed. For citations and references, it is mandatory to use the Mendeley App.

Research Significance 

What impact/benefits/contributions will this research provide to society/explain specifically for the general public or scientific and academic development.

CONCLUSION

A conclusion needs to be discussed comprehensively. A conclusion is the core point of research findings and discussion. This section needs to be synthesized comprehensively, especially in terms of the author's critical evaluation of research findings. It is not merely a re-statement of the data or findings but a synthesis of key points as mentioned in the introduction, which eventually produces the “Results and Discussion” chapter so that there is compatibility. The prospects for developing research findings and the prospects for future research applications (based on findings and discussion) can also be added. The conclusion, of course, must be able to answer the research objectives. Remember, the length of the conclusion is only about 5% of the total content of the manuscript.

The classic mistake in writing conclusions in scientific articles is to write them in the form of points (pointers). You should write a conclusion in coherent paragraph form, not in bullet points. Therefore, you must do it carefully.

Recommendation for Future Research

Describe recommendations or suggestions for subsequent researchers who take up this topic. Examples: The hope is that this research will be strengthened intrinsically and extrinsically. Future research is expected to be able to develop treatment models through experimental research specifically in producing treatment models for adolescents who are in vulnerable environments.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

If any, acknowledgment can be stated here. This section displays authors’ appreciation to sponsors, fund donors, resource persons, or parties who have an important role in conducting research. Examples: The author thanks the original participants in this study for their trust, willingness to learn, and desire to create meaningful change. 

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTEREST

Examples: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

The references entry is arranged in alphabetical order. All that is referred to in the text must be listed in the reference list, and all written in the reference list must be referred to in the text. The author is obliged to list all the references validly according to the sources and DOI (digital object identifier), particularly for entries from journals. In the case of cities of publication, differences should be made in writing cities of the USA and cities outside the USA. For example, cities in the USA are listed together with the initials of the state; e.g.: for Boston of Massachusset: Boston, MA. All references and citations use the APA Style 7th Edition. For citation and reference managers, it is mandatory to use the Mendeley app. If there are information and explanations relating to the further clarification of the content of the manuscript citation is using footnotes.

Examples of reference entries:

(Type: book, author = publisher)

American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

(Type: e-book)

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2005). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9853/how-people-learn-brainmind-experience-and-school-expanded-edition.

(Type: edited book, two editors or more)

Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure? New York, NY: Routledge.

(Type: book section)

Idris, S., Tabrani ZA., Sulaiman, F., & Amsori. (2020). Emerging Perspectives and Trends in Innovative Technology for Quality Education 4.0. In Kusmawan et.al. (Eds.). Assessment of Critical Education Concepts in the Perspective of Islamic Education. London: Routledge, pp. 66-70.

(Type: book, in English translated into Indonesian, original title intact)

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (E. Hamdiah & R. Fajar, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. (Original work published 2012).

(Type: book, Indonesian, not translation, an original title retained)

Tabrani ZA. (2017). Menggugat Logika Nalar Rasionalisme Aristoteles. Yogyakarta: Mizan. 

(Type: book, one author)

Tabrani ZA (2015). Persuit Epsitemology of Islamic Studies. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.

(Type: book, two authors)

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (Fifth ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

(Type: book, three authors)

Walidin, W., Idris, S., & Tabrani ZA. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif & Grounded Theory. Banda Aceh: FTK Ar-Raniry Press.

(Type: journal article, online)

Patimah, S., & Tabrani ZA. (2018). Counting Methodology on Educational Return Investment. Advanced Science Letters, 24(10), 7087–7089. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12414

Damaskinidis, G. (2017). Ideological shifts between bilingual EU texts: A critical discourse analysis (CDA) approach to translation. Babel, 63, 702-728.

Mohd Yusoff, M. Z., Hamzah, A., Fajri, I., ZA, T., & Yusuf, S. M. (2022). The Effect of Spiritual and Social Norm in Moral Judgement. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 27(1), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2022.2156799 

(Type: journal article, if the doi doesn't exist, then there must be an article URL)

Idris, S., Tabrani ZA., Sulaiman, F., & Murziqin, R. (2020). The Role of KKNI Curriculum in Supporting the Development of Education at the LPTK UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6), 4011-4024. Retrieved from https://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/15765/7958

(Type: journal article, three authors)

Casey, E., Kudeva, R., & Rousson, A. (2018). Institutionalization of Religion in Schools to Intercultural Education. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v6i1.215 

(Type: journal article, 4 or more authors, all full names written)

Abdullah, A., Ismail, M., Yaacob, M., Kamarudin, M., Mohd Alwi, M., Muhammad, M., Wan Mohd Nasir, W., & Hilaluddin, N. (2019). A Qualitative Approach towards the Understanding of Managerial Employees in Islamic Organizations. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 7(3), 589-600. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v7i3.465 

(Types: prosiding)

Retnowati, E. (2012, 24-27 November). Learning mathematics collaboratively or  Individually. Paper presented at the The 2nd International Conference of STEM in Education, Beijing Normal University, China. https://stem2012.bnu.edu.cn/data/short%20paper/stem2012_88.pdf. 

(Type: document, report:  institution, government, organization)

NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

(Type: document, legal texts, original terms written followed by translation)

Peraturan Presiden RI. No. 8. (2012). Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia. [Indonesian National Qualification Framework].

Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi RI. No. 44. (2015). Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. [National Standards of Higher Education].

Appendix  

Appendixes are optional. An appendix should not be longer than two pages.

PARAGRAPH WRITING TIPS: 

Formula: PRECP

P (point)                                : 1 sentence.

R (reasons)                            : 2 sentences.

E (evidence)                          : 3 sentences.

C (conclusion)                      : 1 sentence.

P (points for affirmation)  : 2 sentences.

1. Fluent, comprehensible, and correct use of English is the main criterion. The authors should ensure that the manuscript has no lingual problems. Otherwise, it is rejected in the pre-assessment. Proofreading is strongly advised;
2. Manuscripts should be prepared in Microsoft Word (We strongly recommend authors to follow the template we provide! But we also give authors the freedom to be creative in writing their articles.) and submitted through the JSID website. JSID accepts only electronic (online) submissions. Therefore, authors must log in before submitting their articles. Please click here to log in;
3. Documents that must be attached when submitting an article: (1) The Manuscript of The Article. (2) Proof of Turnitin Check (Below 20%) (If you do not report it, we assume that you are sure that your article is original). (3) Author's Agreement and Statement Form;
4. Submissions must be in English or Indonesian (if the article is written in Indonesian, the title, abstract and keywords must be in English), based on the style outlined by the American Psychological Association (7th edition). Documents that are not in compliance with the journal’s submission criteria will be returned to the sender for corrections;
5. Ensure that manuscript submitted is a manuscript that has never been published in any publication or no publication is being requested or considered by other media, with attaching the Author's Statement (By submitting articles to our journal, we assume that you have agreed to all of our regulations, even though the author has not returned or signed this form) (Download the Statement Form);
6. Journal of Society Innovation and Development is a peer-reviewed scientific open access journal, not a commercial journal. But the renewal process, capacity expansion, technical improvements, and daily maintenance of the journal necessitate funding;
7. All the manuscripts pass through a double-blind peer review according to international standards. (Read Review Process).